The house of bread had no bread. That's the first thing that strikes me when I read the opening of this story — the sheer, almost cruel irony of it. Bethlehem, a name that literally means house of bread, was in the grip of a famine. No food. No future on the horizon. Just empty fields and a family staring at a choice they never wanted to have to make.
We've been spending time in the period of the Judges here at Gloria Dei, and today I want to step slightly to the side of the judges themselves and look at one family whose story unfolds in that same difficult era. This is the story of Naomi, her husband Elimelech, their two sons — and eventually, a daughter-in-law named Ruth. It's a story about displacement and loss and grief. But underneath all of that, it's really a story about what it looks like to leave everything behind in order to follow God — and what kind of God is worth doing that for.
A Family Forced to Move
The Book of Ruth opens with a scene that would have been immediately recognizable to anyone living through hard times. Here is how it begins:
In the days when the judges ruled, there was a famine in the land, and a man from Bethlehem in Judah, together with his wife and two sons, went to sojourn in the country of Moab. The man's name was Elimelech, his wife's name was Naomi, and the names of his two sons were Mahlon and Chilion.
A famine. A family. A decision to leave home and go somewhere — anywhere — that might have food. This is not a story that begins with triumph or drama. It begins with ordinary, desperate people doing what ordinary, desperate people do: they move. They go somewhere else. They try to survive.
They end up in Moab, a neighboring country to the east of Israel across the Jordan River and the Dead Sea. And they don't just pass through — they stay. Ten years. In that time, the boys grow up, fall in love, and marry Moabite women. One is named Orpah. The other is named Ruth. Life settles into something that might have almost felt normal again, something that could have passed for ordinary. And then everything collapses.
In those ten years, all three of the men die. Elimelech first, then both sons. The text doesn't linger on the how, and I think we should take a moment to sit with that. Sometimes our modern imaginations flatten the ancient world into something like a movie set — vivid and dramatic on the surface, but somehow not quite real. But this was a genuinely dangerous time to be alive. We've been reading through the Judges, and violence runs through almost every page: war, raids, conflict between tribes and nations. Beyond the violence, there were infections that today a simple course of antibiotics would knock out in a week. There were accidents, disease, and dangers we don't even think about because we have hospitals and emergency rooms and preventive medicine. In that world, people died young, and they died without much warning, and those left behind were often left with almost nothing.
That is exactly where Naomi finds herself. Her husband is gone. Both sons are gone. She is an older woman in a foreign country, with no male provider, no social security, no pension, and no government safety net. In the ancient Near East, a widow without male relatives in her corner was genuinely among the most vulnerable people in society. Two of them together — Naomi, Orpah, and Ruth — were three women in exactly that position.
The Road Back to Bethlehem
Then news arrives. The famine in Bethlehem is over. The Lord has visited his people and given them food. And Naomi makes a decision: she is going home. She has family back in Bethlehem — relatives who, under God's law, carry obligations of care for her. She is going back to the house of bread, now that the house of bread actually has bread again.
Orpah and Ruth both insist they are coming with her. They love Naomi. They want to stay with her. And Naomi, in one of the most poignant moments in the whole story, looks at these two young women who are her daughters-in-law and says something like: No. I love you. Go home. Go back to your own families. Go back to your own people. You are young — find husbands, build lives, enjoy the gifts God has for you. By some miracle, even if I were to have more sons tonight, are you really going to wait around for them to grow up and marry them? Go. Live.
And Orpah, after clinging to her and weeping, eventually says goodbye. She turns back toward Moab. That is not a condemnation of Orpah — Naomi had urged her to go, had released her with love. But Ruth will not move. The text uses a specific word: she clung to Naomi. And then Ruth speaks one of the most beloved passages in all of Scripture:
Where you go I will go, and where you stay I will stay. Your people will be my people and your God will be my God.
There is a depth to this declaration that I don't want us to move past too quickly. Ruth is not just saying I like you or even I love you. She is making a covenantal commitment. She is saying: I am binding myself to you, to your people, and to your God. That last phrase is the one that changes everything — your God will be my God.
A God Worth Everything
Here is something worth understanding about the ancient world. When people talked about different nations, they were also talking about different gods. Every people group, every nation, every region had its own deities. Travel across a border and you were in the territory, so to speak, of a different set of gods. Loyalty to one nation generally meant loyalty to that nation's gods. So when Ruth says your God will be my God, she is not making a minor adjustment. She is converting. She is turning her back on the gods of Moab and placing her trust in the God of Israel.
What brought her to that point? We don't know exactly. Maybe it was her husband. Maybe it was years of watching Naomi live out her faith, even in grief. Maybe it was conversations she had no idea were shaping her. But somewhere in those ten years in Moab, Ruth encountered the message of the one true God through the family she married into, and something in her recognized it as true.
And the contrast between the God of Israel and the primary god of Moab would have been stark, to put it mildly. The chief god of Moab was Molech. And Molech required something that I think most of us find almost incomprehensible — infant sacrifice. Families were expected to bring their children, living children, and offer them in the flames of Molech's altar. This was the religious world Ruth had grown up in. This was what worship had looked like around her.
And then she encountered Yahweh — the God of the Old Testament, the God of Israel. A God who never demands that his people kill their children. A God who, as we read further into the Scripture, is himself going to give his own Son in order to save us. The God who does not take; the God who gives. The God who does not consume; the God who provides. The contrast is not subtle, and I think Ruth felt it. She experienced the love and mercy of the Lord in a way that she had never experienced anything in Moab, and she said: This is my God. I believe in him.
That is why she goes back with Naomi. Not just out of loyalty to a mother-in-law she loves. But because she has been converted by the good news of who this God actually is.
Arriving in Bethlehem
When they arrive in Bethlehem, the whole town stirs. People recognize Naomi and they call out to her — here she is, she has come back. And Naomi's response is one of the most raw and honest moments in all of Scripture. She says: don't call me Naomi. Naomi means comfort or pleasant. Call me Mara. Mara means bitter. Because God has dealt bitterly with me. I left full and I have come back empty.
There is no tidying that up. There is no positive spin. Naomi is not pretending that God has been wonderful to her recently, because from where she is standing in this moment, that is not how it feels. She has buried her husband. She has buried both sons. She has watched this young daughter-in-law leave everything she has ever known to follow her back to a land that isn't Ruth's own. She is exhausted and grieved and she doesn't have the energy to call herself anything other than what she feels: bitter.
And yet — and this is important — she is not without hope. She is walking back toward Bethlehem on purpose. She has heard that the Lord has visited his people and given them food, and she is moving toward that. She knows there are relatives there. She knows there is a system of care that God's law has established for people like her. She is bitter, yes. But she is not giving up. She is going to the place where God's provision is, even when God himself feels far away.
And the text hints that one of the key instruments of that provision is a man named Boaz — a relative of Elimelech's family who is going to play a significant role in Ruth and Naomi's story. We'll dig into Boaz and what his relationship with this family looks like in the next post. But even here, before Boaz has appeared, before the redemption has fully unfolded, there is already provision in place. The empty satchel — the life that looks like it has nothing left in it — is about to be filled. Not yet. But the road to Bethlehem is the right road.
Leaving Things Behind
I want to spend some time with something that Ruth's story presses on me, because I think it presses on all of us. Ruth had to leave everything behind in order to follow God. Everything. Her homeland. Her family of origin. Her culture. The gods she had grown up around. The language and customs and social networks that made life familiar and navigable. She walked away from all of it. And she did that because in the God of Israel — the God she had come to know through Naomi's family — she saw something better than what the world around her could offer. She experienced love and mercy that the gods of Moab had never given, could never give.
Now, here is the question that Ruth's story puts to us as Christians in the twenty-first century. We have received something even better than what Ruth received. We have the full picture. We have the cross. We have the resurrection. We have the completed story of the God who did not demand the sacrifice of our children but gave his own Son so that we could be brought near to him. We have experienced God's love and mercy through Jesus in a way that Ruth could only have glimpsed from a distance.
So what are we clinging to that we should have left behind on the road?
This is not a comfortable question, and I don't want to paper over it. One of the struggles I see — one of the struggles I feel in my own life — is the desire to have both. To receive the grace of God and the forgiveness of Christ and the promise of eternal life, and also to hold on with both fists to the comforts, pleasures, and habits of this world that we know, deep down, are pulling us in the wrong direction. We want God's salvation without repentance. We want his mercy without the turning away. We want the destination without the road.
The saints of old recognized this tension in themselves, too. This is nothing new. St. Augustine, one of the greatest theologians the church has ever produced, wrote honestly about his own struggle with this in his Confessions. He said he used to pray something like this: Lord, make me chaste — but not yet. He wanted to be holy. He also wanted to keep enjoying the things of this world that had their hooks in him. That tension is real, and Augustine's honesty about it is one of the things that makes his story so powerful. He was not pretending. He was telling the truth about what it feels like to be a person caught between the pull of God and the pull of the world.
And the answer the Christian tradition has always given is not that the things of this world are evil in themselves, or that we should have nothing and enjoy nothing and hold nothing. The answer is about how we hold them. There is a way of holding the gifts of this life lightly — receiving them with gratitude as gifts from God, enjoying them, even using them for the benefit of others — without letting them become the thing our hearts are anchored to. There is a way of living in this world where the love of God and the shape that love gives to our lives is at the center, and everything else finds its proper place around that center.
Ruth models something of that for us. She did not leave Moab because Moab had nothing good in it. She left because she had found something better. She had encountered a God of love and mercy, a God who gives rather than takes, a God whose care for the vulnerable — for widows, for foreigners, for the poor — was unlike anything she had seen in the religious world she came from. And when Naomi said she was going back to Bethlehem, Ruth could not stay behind. Not because she was forced to go. But because she knew where the bread was.
The House of Bread
The house of bread had no bread when this story started. That's the irony the text leans into at the very beginning. But Naomi is walking back toward Bethlehem because she has heard that the Lord has visited his people. The famine is over. The bread is there again. And Ruth, who has given up everything to follow this God and this woman, is walking toward it too — a foreigner in a land that is not her own, with nothing but her faith and her loyalty and whatever God is going to do next.
This is worth sitting with: the town whose name means house of bread is, of course, the same Bethlehem that we talk about every Christmas. The same Bethlehem where, centuries after Ruth walked through its gates, another kind of bread would arrive — the one who would call himself the Bread of Life, born in a manger in the town whose name had always been pointing toward him. The connections in Scripture are never accidental. Ruth's story is threaded into a much larger story, and that larger story runs all the way to a stable and a cross and an empty tomb.
Ruth didn't know all of that yet. She knew what she had experienced: a God of mercy. A God who cared for widows and foreigners. A God who visited his people and gave them food. That was enough to leave Moab for. That was enough to walk an unknown road with an older woman who was calling herself Mara. That was enough to let go of everything familiar and press forward toward the house of bread.
As we continue through this story next week — and as Boaz enters the picture with his own remarkable role to play — I want to carry this question with us: what would it look like for you to hold the things of this world a little more lightly this week? Not to despise them or throw them away, but to receive them as gifts, enjoy them with an open hand, and keep the center of your life anchored to the God who is the source of every good thing anyway? Ruth walked away from Moab not because there was nothing there, but because she had found something better. You and I have that same something better — and even more of it, because we have seen the whole story. What are we still clinging to that it's time to set down on the road?
Comments